Skip to content

My personal archive

Last updated: 26 October 2026

THE ASSANGE ARCHIVE.

What I published. What they did about it. What comes next.

SECRET

U.S. REMOVAL OF PAKISTAN RESEARCH REACTOR FUEL ON HOLD

US diplomatic cable 09ISLAMABAD1152 · Pakistan Islamabad · 2009-05-27 16:32 · Read at WikiLeaks PlusD »

Reference ID09ISLAMABAD1152
Created2009 May 27, 16:32 (Wednesday)
OriginPakistan Islamabad
CountryPakistan
ClassificationSECRET
ToAfghanistan Kabul; Central Intelligence Agency; Department of Energy; India New Delhi; Joint Chiefs of Staff; National Security Council; Pakistan Karachi; Pakistan Lahore; Pakistan Peshawar; Secretary of Defense; Secretary of State; United Kingdom London; United States Central Command
TAGSKNNP - Nuclear Non-Proliferation MNUC - Military and Defense Affairs--Military Nuclear Applications PARM - Political Affairs--Arms Controls and Disarmament PGOV - Political Affairs--Government; Internal Governmental Affairs PK - Pakistan PREL - Political Affairs--External Political Relations PTER - Political Affairs--Terrorists and Terrorism
Character count2,239

Why this cable is notable

Ambassador Patterson's May 2009 cable said Pakistan was stalling the removal of highly enriched uranium from a research reactor.

Reported by: The New York Times

Cable text

SECRET S E C R E T ISLAMABAD 001152 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/27/2019 TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PTER, PARM, KNNP, MNUC, PK SUBJECT: U.S. REMOVAL OF PAKISTAN RESEARCH REACTOR FUEL ON HOLD Classified By: Anne W. Patterson for reasons 1.4 (b) (d) 1. (S) Kamran Akhtar, Disarmament Director in Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told Poloff on May 26 that the recent spate of media attention on Pakistan's nuclear security has led the GOP to delay an important nonproliferation effort, the removal of U.S.-origin highly-enriched uranium spent fuel from a Pakistani nuclear research reactor. The GOP agreed in principle to the fuel removal in 2007, but has been slow in scheduling a visit by U.S. technical experts to discuss logistical and other issues. In recent months, the Strategic Plans Division and Ministry of Foreign Affairs both indicated progress on the matter and a proposed visit for late May was under review. However, according to Akhtar, a recent GOP interagency review of the program concluded that the "sensational" international and local media coverage of the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons made it impossible to proceed at this time. If the local media got word of the fuel removal, "they certainly would portray it as the United States taking Pakistan's nuclear weapons," he argued. The visit will have to be delayed for 3-4 months or until the political climate makes it more conducive to hosting a U.S. visit, he stated. 2. (S) Comment: As noted in previous post reporting, the GOP is extremely sensitive to media focus on Pakistan's nuclear program. In a sign of their growing defensiveness, the Foreign Office Spokesman took significant time out of his May 21 press conference to address nuclear security, stating categorically, "there is simply no question of our strategic assets falling into the wrong hands." To a question about reported offers of U.S. help with nuclear security, he responded, "we do not need this assistance." With the postponement of the nuclear fuel removal, it is clear that the negative media attention has begun to hamper U.S. efforts to improve Pakistan's nuclear security and nonproliferation practices. End Comment. PATTERSON

Reproduced as published in WikiLeaks’ PlusD library.