SECRET
U.S. REMOVAL OF PAKISTAN RESEARCH REACTOR FUEL ON HOLD
US diplomatic cable 09ISLAMABAD1152 · Pakistan Islamabad · 2009-05-27 16:32 · Read at WikiLeaks PlusD »
| Reference ID | 09ISLAMABAD1152 |
|---|---|
| Created | 2009 May 27, 16:32 (Wednesday) |
| Origin | Pakistan Islamabad |
| Country | Pakistan |
| Classification | SECRET |
| To | Afghanistan Kabul; Central Intelligence Agency; Department of Energy; India New Delhi; Joint Chiefs of Staff; National Security Council; Pakistan Karachi; Pakistan Lahore; Pakistan Peshawar; Secretary of Defense; Secretary of State; United Kingdom London; United States Central Command |
| TAGS | KNNP - Nuclear Non-Proliferation MNUC - Military and Defense Affairs--Military Nuclear Applications PARM - Political Affairs--Arms Controls and Disarmament PGOV - Political Affairs--Government; Internal Governmental Affairs PK - Pakistan PREL - Political Affairs--External Political Relations PTER - Political Affairs--Terrorists and Terrorism |
| Character count | 2,239 |
Why this cable is notable
Ambassador Patterson's May 2009 cable said Pakistan was stalling the removal of highly enriched uranium from a research reactor.
Reported by: The New York Times
Cable text
SECRET
S E C R E T ISLAMABAD 001152
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/27/2019
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PTER, PARM, KNNP, MNUC, PK
SUBJECT: U.S. REMOVAL OF PAKISTAN RESEARCH REACTOR FUEL ON
HOLD
Classified By: Anne W. Patterson for reasons 1.4 (b) (d)
1. (S) Kamran Akhtar, Disarmament Director in Pakistan's
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told Poloff on May 26 that the
recent spate of media attention on Pakistan's nuclear
security has led the GOP to delay an important
nonproliferation effort, the removal of U.S.-origin
highly-enriched uranium spent fuel from a Pakistani nuclear
research reactor. The GOP agreed in principle to the fuel
removal in 2007, but has been slow in scheduling a visit by
U.S. technical experts to discuss logistical and other
issues. In recent months, the Strategic Plans Division and
Ministry of Foreign Affairs both indicated progress on the
matter and a proposed visit for late May was under review.
However, according to Akhtar, a recent GOP interagency review
of the program concluded that the "sensational" international
and local media coverage of the security of Pakistan's
nuclear weapons made it impossible to proceed at this time.
If the local media got word of the fuel removal, "they
certainly would portray it as the United States taking
Pakistan's nuclear weapons," he argued. The visit will have
to be delayed for 3-4 months or until the political climate
makes it more conducive to hosting a U.S. visit, he stated.
2. (S) Comment: As noted in previous post reporting, the GOP
is extremely sensitive to media focus on Pakistan's nuclear
program. In a sign of their growing defensiveness, the
Foreign Office Spokesman took significant time out of his May
21 press conference to address nuclear security, stating
categorically, "there is simply no question of our strategic
assets falling into the wrong hands." To a question about
reported offers of U.S. help with nuclear security, he
responded, "we do not need this assistance." With the
postponement of the nuclear fuel removal, it is clear that
the negative media attention has begun to hamper U.S. efforts
to improve Pakistan's nuclear security and nonproliferation
practices. End Comment.
PATTERSON
Reproduced as published in WikiLeaks’ PlusD library.